Argument from evil buddhist perspective

The Problem of Evil and Suffering

Each of these constituents is constantly changing, constantly in flux; therefore the "self" is also constantly changing. A number of replies have been offered to this puzzle, but some philosophers conclude that the notion of omnipotence as traditionally defined is incoherent and must be redefined if the concept of God is to remain a plausible one.

God, Freedom, and Foreknowledge. An atheist may rightly reject such an answer, but only if he or she is first willing to face a much more difficult question.

An intimate, loving, eternal relationship with God, for example, may well be a good that is infinite and incomparable with any other kind of good.

Many factors account for this, including challenges to psychological and sociological theories which hold belief in God to be pathological or neurotic. Why would God remain hidden and elusive, especially when individuals would benefit from being aware of God.

Thus, one meaning of the Eightfold Path is that extreme approaches to seeking enlightenment are not necessary. Much of what is good has become corrupted, and this corruption stems from these free creatures, not from God. Many objections have been raised against the kalam argument, both scientific and philosophical, including that there are other cosmological models of the universe besides the Big Bang in which the universe is understood to be eternal, such as various multi-verse theories.

Evil, then, turns out to be a metaphysical privation, a privatio boni privation of goodnessor the going wrong of something that is inherently good. On one interpretation of the standard Big Bang cosmological model, the time-space universe sprang into existence ex nihilo approximately God could accomplish this by making moral actions especially pleasurable, or evil action and suffering impossible by allowing free will but not allowing the ability to enact evil or impose suffering.

An omniscient, wholly good being would prevent the occurrence of any intense suffering it could, unless it could not do so without thereby losing some greater good or permitting some evil equally bad or worse. Another early argument with strong contemporary resonance was advanced by the influential theologian Augustine, born inwho became the Bishop of Hippo in north Africa.

Rather, be afraid of the one who can destroy both soul and body in hell" Matthew Andy Walters September 13, at 8: This response to the logical argument from evil is called a defense, which is distinguished from a theodicy.

The Necessary Shape of Contingency. After reviewing the comments, you probably are in a better position to evaluate my ideas.

Evidential Arguments from Evil

For the logical problem of evilit is asserted that the two claims, 1 an omnipotent and omnibenevolent God exists, and 2 evil exists, are logically incompatible.

There are persons who do not believe in God, and they are reasonable in doing so. What did he find. If there is a personal, creator God who brought these two persons into the world, God seems to be unloving and unjust.

The Cause of Suffering

That instinct for proselytising unto war which has made both of these religions such distinctly harmful forces in the story of mankind is nowhere present. Fires, tornados, earthquakes, hurricanes, tsunami, and physical illnesses e.

This longing craving, desire gives rise to, or causes, a new cycle of life and death. In a curious twist unique to Buddhism, rigidity of method has infected the structure of belief, ossifying potential explanations of existence into dogmatic assertions mechanically arrived at.

The path to the end of suffering is the Noble Eightfold Path that is, the eightfold path for the spiritually aware: An omnipotent being has the power to prevent that evil from coming into existence. I do think that pointing to our own contribution to suffering — how we make it worse by fighting reality — is important.

Nevertheless, the evidential problem of evil remains a central argument type against the plausibility of theism. Often, God simply lets us live with the consequences of our actions Galatians 6: That is, while such persons do not believe that God exists, they should so believe.

There is something dreadfully tragic about believing yourself to have somehow failed your calling whenever joy manages to creep into your life. It is something to be Finally Escaped.

There are four unavoidable physical sufferings: According to this theodicy, as advanced by Hick, God created the world as a good place, but no paradise, for developing morally and spiritually mature beings.

The question of whether theism is coherent is an important one, for if there is reason to believe that theism is incoherent, theistic belief is in an important sense undermined. Others scholars argue that Buddha refused to answer questions about the self, and that to deny the existence of the self is just as much of an obstacle as is the self.

Simply stated, there is evil in the world because humans choose to do evil things.

The dark side of Buddhism

The standard form of this argument was provided by J.L. Mackie in Evil and Omnipotence (). Mackie argued that theism can be disproved like so: (1) If. The Cause of Suffering — 47 Comments Ordinary human on June 23, After reading all the arguments and comments I have concluded that your original critique still stands quite strongly.

Especially, I found your explanation about Buddhism’s perspective of suffering very sophisticated and well-informed. At the same time, while I was. Suffering and the Problem of Evil. The first sermon that the Buddha preached after his enlightenment concerned the Four Noble Truths.

This is the most well known of Buddhist doctrines in the west. Argument From Evil (Buddhist Perspective) The argument from evil In this paper I am going to use the very popular argument from evil, which was made popular and originated from the Greek philosopher Epicurus, to argue that existence of god is highly improbable.

From a Buddhist perspective, there is something delusive about both sides of this mirror-image, and it is important to understand how this black-and-white way of thinking brings more suffering, more evil. Philosophy of Religion. Philosophy of religion is the philosophical study of the meaning and nature of religion.

It includes the analyses of religious concepts, beliefs, terms, arguments, and practices of religious adherents.

Argument from evil buddhist perspective
Rated 4/5 based on 16 review
The Philosophy of Religion: A Buddhist Perspective - Arvind Sharma - Google Books